If you intresting in sport Buy trenbolone and Buy testosterone enanthate you find place where you can find information about steroids
  • Resources

  • Book of the Month

  • Shopping on Amazon? Use this search box and support Dangerous Talk at the same time.
  • Blog Directories

    blog search directory Religion Top Blogs
  • AdSense

buy genuine windows 8 cheap download lightroom mac os purchase windows 7 pro best price adobe elements 8 mac best buy adobe elements 12 mac
purchase word 2007 buy autocad lt 2011 software download powerpoint 2008 microsoft cheap adobe photoshop cs4 to buy microsoft office 2010 standard price
  • purchase autodesk inventor lt best price for outlook express buy office 2007 student licence price of illustrator cs4 lightroom 5 education discount
  • acyclovir salep untuk ibu menyusui tamoxifen tablets ip 10mg where can i buy clobetasol propionate cream valacyclovir salep xenical no prescription needed
      buying 2013 office outlook price of windows 8.1 pro oem windows 7 professional oem 64 bit buy photoshop cs4 mac uk
    achat cialis livraison express köpa viagra i sverige generico de la levitra de diez

    Atheism 2.0

    I rarely ever say anything negative about other atheists. The way I see it is that we are all in this fight together and we each have our own approaches to the problem. With that said, Alain de Botton’s “Atheism 2.0” is stupid.

    Alain de Botton is basically the British equivalent to Greg Epstein, but worse. Greg Epstein is the Humanist Chaplin at Harvard University and for the most part I don’t have much of a problem with his approach. I don’t like that he is trying to make Humanism more like the traditional theistic religions except without the God, but that’s his thing. But it seems that de Botton takes it much further and the fact that he confuses atheism with humanism makes it even worse.

    Atheism is just a lack of belief in deities. It is not in and of itself a system of belief. Not all atheists are rational, nor do all atheists value rationality, reason, and science. These are Humanist values. While all Humanists are atheists and most atheists are Humanists, not all atheists are actually Humanists. When de Botton labeled his ultra-religious Humanism as “Atheism 2.0” he is confusing the already confused theists.

    Take for example, the recent Huffington Post article, “Atheist Temple: Nonbelievers To Get Place Of ‘Worship’ In UK.” The fact is that Humanists already have meeting places so de Botton isn’t doing anything new really. There are Ethical Humanist Societies all over America and much of Europe too. But by labeling it as an “Atheist Temple” de Botton gets people’s attention. Plus, it seems like de Botton’s idea of an “Atheist Temple” would even make most Humanists cringe.

    Again, while I disagree with Alain de Botton’s “Atheism 2.0,” I would support his efforts in that I think we need to take multiple approaches to the problem of religion. However, I don’t like his terminology which I think is confusing at best. For more on “Atheism 2.0,” check out de Botton’s TED Talk.

    Enhanced by Zemanta
    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...