If you intresting in sport Buy trenbolone and Buy testosterone enanthate you find place where you can find information about steroids
  • Resources

  • Book of the Month

  • Shopping on Amazon? Use this search box and support Dangerous Talk at the same time.
  • Blog Directories

    blog search directory Religion Top Blogs
  • AdSense

purchase autocad lt 2004 
best price quicken 2009 
buy punch home design studio mac 
cheap elements 7 
cost of ilife 11 
best price access 2007 
best buy ilife 09 family pack 
best price microsoft works 8.0 
buy filemaker pro 10 uk 
buy office 2007 standard oem 
price of mindjet mindmanager 8 
buy aperture 2.1 1 
order 2003 access 
buy microsoft streets and trips 2009 
buy corel draw x5 upgrade 
buy windows 7 disk buy cs4 web premium mac purchase quicken home business 2008 cheap toast mac buy adobe photoshop elements 8 mac buying 2007 office product key purchase nero 6 buy dvd moviefactory 6 plus cheap camtasia studio purchase paint shop pro x2 best price adobe acrobat 9.0 professional buy autocad 2009 full version discount microsoft office 2010 teachers purchase excel mac cheap microsoft word 2010 download

The Assumed All Fallacy

People often have conversations in which we label others into groups. Those group identities can be created by others or the group themselves. Either case, when we talk about the group ambiguity creeps in. The perceiver may make the assumption that the conversation must apply to the entire group rather than the group in general. This is a fallacy I will call the Assumed All Fallacy.

For example, if I were to make the statement, “The English love to tea,” it would be a fallacy to conclude that there is an “assumed all” in the statement. It is probably that there are at least a few English who do not in fact love tea. The statement about English loving tea is a general statement.

Loving tea is not in this case a defining characteristic of being English and so therefore it should be interpreted as a general statement about many or most English rather than “assumed all” statement about every single man and woman living in England.

Now, let’s take this fallacy into a more controversial application. “Christians oppose same-sex marriage.” This again is a general statement and not a statement about every single Christian. To assume that this statement refers to every single Christian and not to Christians in general would be an example of the Assumed All Fallacy.

“Muslims use fear and terrorism to suppress criticism.” Again, this statement is not a defining characteristic of all Muslims; it is a general statement about many Muslims. In fact, it has become such a common characteristic that the Muslim culture has become known throughout the world for this tactic. Obviously there are Muslims who do not use fear and terrorism to suppress criticism just as there are English people who do not like tea. But the statement in general is true. When people “assume all” in such statements they are being fallacious.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
  • http://CoffeeShopAtheist.com/blog Patrick

    I really like this concept, and I think it has very broad applicationsto the way we communicate. I’ll have to focus on this in my next “Fallacy Friday” segment on my blog (with permission and citation, of coruse)

  • Eperce

    very good article.