{"id":2200,"date":"2011-04-12T10:07:40","date_gmt":"2011-04-12T15:07:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dangeroustalk.net\/?p=2200"},"modified":"2011-04-12T10:07:40","modified_gmt":"2011-04-12T15:07:40","slug":"boxing-you-own-weight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.dangeroustalk.net\/?p=2200","title":{"rendered":"Boxing You Own Weight"},"content":{"rendered":"

Generally speaking, I tend to get quite a few demands from fundamentalist religious believers to engage in some sort of debate. I imagine that some of the more famous atheists get hundreds a day. There simply is no time to debate every fundy wishing to make a name for themselves so obviously atheists need to choose who to debate. Those who already have experience and can show some sort of familiarity with the issues take priority.<\/p>\n

Of course this is true on the other side too. I would love to debate Ray Comfort and his boy toy. But I don\u2019t demand it because I know that I am not in his fame class. My experience is not as extensive as his and if I could debate him, it would significantly raise my debating stature. William Lane Craig is an in a much higher debating weight class than that. This isn\u2019t to say he knows more or is more correct, but simply that he has more experience debating and has a higher fame stature within his community.<\/p>\n

The point is that the market decides our debating class, not necessarily knowledge and skill. Although knowledge and skill do have some place in the imaginary rankings. Especially in my level on the debate scale, knowledge and skill have more to do with the issue than fame and audience size. Still, I can\u2019t debate every theist with a Bible.
\n
\n\"Bookmark<\/a>