<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atheist Unity Convention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dangeroustalk.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dangeroustalk.net/?p=759</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:56:39 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Staks</title>
		<link>http://www.dangeroustalk.net/?p=759&#038;cpage=1#comment-35746</link>
		<dc:creator>Staks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangeroustalk.net/?p=759#comment-35746</guid>
		<description>I think you missed the joke about my invitation being lost in the mail. But one point that I want to make clear is that the convention (if it takes place) should go out of their way to spotlight net atheists. 

I think that if we don&#039;t focus the unity convention on politics, then there really isn&#039;t a point to it. There would be no difference between many smaller conventions or one big one. But if we want to make a statement that people of reason vote and can affect an election, then one big convention is important to show our strength.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you missed the joke about my invitation being lost in the mail. But one point that I want to make clear is that the convention (if it takes place) should go out of their way to spotlight net atheists. </p>
<p>I think that if we don&#8217;t focus the unity convention on politics, then there really isn&#8217;t a point to it. There would be no difference between many smaller conventions or one big one. But if we want to make a statement that people of reason vote and can affect an election, then one big convention is important to show our strength.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemant</title>
		<link>http://www.dangeroustalk.net/?p=759&#038;cpage=1#comment-35738</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangeroustalk.net/?p=759#comment-35738</guid>
		<description>The meeting this weekend is not for &quot;atheist leaders,&quot; but rather for the leaders of the national atheist organizations.  There&#039;s a different.  Many &quot;big-name&quot; atheists (like PZ or the YouTubers or bloggers) are not part of this gathering.  It&#039;s not because we don&#039;t care about them or recognize their importance or anything like that.  They just don&#039;t run non-profit groups.  End of story.  We talk about things like strategy for our groups, agenda items for the coming year, how to share resources, etc.  It&#039;s not about how to be the rulers of all atheists.

A possible Unity Convention *may* be held in DC, but maybe not.  Politics is not a major priority.  It&#039;s just a possibility.  I wouldn&#039;t read any more into it than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The meeting this weekend is not for &#8220;atheist leaders,&#8221; but rather for the leaders of the national atheist organizations.  There&#8217;s a different.  Many &#8220;big-name&#8221; atheists (like PZ or the YouTubers or bloggers) are not part of this gathering.  It&#8217;s not because we don&#8217;t care about them or recognize their importance or anything like that.  They just don&#8217;t run non-profit groups.  End of story.  We talk about things like strategy for our groups, agenda items for the coming year, how to share resources, etc.  It&#8217;s not about how to be the rulers of all atheists.</p>
<p>A possible Unity Convention *may* be held in DC, but maybe not.  Politics is not a major priority.  It&#8217;s just a possibility.  I wouldn&#8217;t read any more into it than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.dangeroustalk.net/?p=759&#038;cpage=1#comment-35697</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangeroustalk.net/?p=759#comment-35697</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are some well know YouTube atheists and bloggers who would not be considered “leaders” yet they often carry more authority than so called leaders of big atheist organizations.&quot;

Edward Current and The Amazing Atheist come to mind here, though the latter seems to be in it more for comedy.  But still, the online community is ever expanding. When I am on online, I don&#039;t feel like Christians outnumber atheists.

&quot;That is one of the real differences between atheists and believers. We are all atheist leaders.&quot;

This is true, we all have our own mind.

I guess it is a good think that a convention exists now but time will tell how it performs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are some well know YouTube atheists and bloggers who would not be considered “leaders” yet they often carry more authority than so called leaders of big atheist organizations.&#8221;</p>
<p>Edward Current and The Amazing Atheist come to mind here, though the latter seems to be in it more for comedy.  But still, the online community is ever expanding. When I am on online, I don&#8217;t feel like Christians outnumber atheists.</p>
<p>&#8220;That is one of the real differences between atheists and believers. We are all atheist leaders.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is true, we all have our own mind.</p>
<p>I guess it is a good think that a convention exists now but time will tell how it performs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
